The second I hit send on the email-the one that gently requested input from three departments whose priorities were diametrically opposed to mine-I knew I was performing. Not leading. Performing.

I was already two hours deep into trying to schedule a meeting that I had no authority to call, yet I was entirely accountable for its success. It felt like I was physically pushing water uphill, watching it immediately roll back down the slope, knowing the entire time that the CEO thinks I’m ‘leading’ this thing. They gave me the title-Initiative Lead, Project Coordinator, whatever flavor of responsibility delegation without resource authorization they used that week-but they didn’t give me the keys to the engine. I was handed a map and told, “You are empowered to drive this initiative,” but the car had no wheels, no gas, and the spare keys were still in the executive vault.

They offload the emotional labor of conflict resolution and inter-departmental diplomacy onto you, the newly ’empowered,’ all while retaining the sole right to make any actual decision that costs more than $878.

The Sisyphean Cost of Permission

I started counting the number of internal negotiations I had to run just to get someone to reply to my initial memo. It was 48, exactly. Forty-eight separate times I had to rewrite the subject line, restructure the appeal, or chase a VP’s assistant just to schedule 30 minutes of their time.

The energy drain isn’t the work itself, it’s the relentless, Sisyphean task of securing permission for the work that has already been assigned to you. This is the shadow economy of the corporate world: spending 80% of your time trying to acquire the 20% of authority necessary to complete the job.

Believing Charm Substitutes Authority

And I have to admit, I fell for it, at least initially. I bought into the motivational speeches. I thought I could ‘hustle’ my way through the power vacuum, that my sheer competence and persuasive charm would substitute for a budget line item or a direct executive mandate. I genuinely believed that if I delivered the results, the authority would retroactively follow. This was my great, stupid mistake.

“

I genuinely believed that if I delivered the results, the authority would retroactively follow.

I lost an entire day last month, not to the initiative itself, but trying to rebuild a spreadsheet that I realized I had left unsaved before my browser crashed, taking forty-eight tabs with it. That sudden, visceral loss of control-that digital equivalent of watching months of focused effort vanish-colors how I view this entire structure. We talk about being focused and being driven, but what good is drive when the road signs are intentionally misleading? What does ‘proactive’ mean when every move requires an appeal to a higher, disinterested court?

That transparency, that direct correlation between resource input and functional output, is a sanity check against the relentless opacity of the ’empowerment’ machine.

Outsourcing Stress: The Real Liability

I spoke about this exact frustration with Liam B., a financial literacy educator I know. Liam deals in the practical reality of assets versus liabilities. He sees the corporate structure and calls it what it is: a liability being placed on the balance sheet of the employee. He was telling me that most people don’t even realize they are subsidizing their company’s failure by absorbing the administrative overhead and the emotional cost of navigating bureaucracy.

“You are doing the work of a mid-level manager,” he told me, “but being paid and treated like a project lead with training wheels. The moment they empower you to lead without giving you the corresponding budget or disciplinary power, they have successfully outsourced their most stressful and conflict-prone tasks, cheap.”

It is a psychological manipulation designed to keep the managerial class clean of sticky outcomes.

The Sanity Check: Direct Input to Output

Contrast this relentless semantic warfare with the simple exchange of value. I need a functional tool; I purchase a functional tool. When I need a new, highly performant machine for my work-maybe even a specialized gaming notebook that promises powerful, straightforward results-I look toward vendors who understand the concept of delivering exactly what they advertise without three weeks of negotiation. Companies like cheap gaming laptop exist on a fundamental promise: we make a product, you pay for it, you receive it, and it performs its function. There is an immediate, verifiable trust.

There is no ’empowerment’ required to use a product you purchased. The product simply works. There is no corporate mission statement necessary to explain why the fan on the laptop spins when it’s supposed to spin.

Yes, and this resourcefulness costs me sleepless nights and endless, unpaid hours spent coordinating people who don’t report to me.

Accountability Without Agency

We confuse performing conflict resolution with exhibiting leadership.

The moment I understood this-that my success in this role only proved that I could effectively operate without any leverage-I realized I was perfecting a skill set that would only ever serve to perpetuate my own subservience.

It felt good for about 8 hours. Then the fatigue set in. Why do we celebrate the ability to navigate arbitrary barriers? Why is the success metric proving you can run a marathon wearing weighted chains? We are so desperate for recognition that we accept the illusion of authority, trading our time and mental health for a title that carries the administrative burden of management without any of its privileges.

The True Currency Spent

So, if we accept that the corporate structure is deliberately designed to offload accountability onto the eager, high-performing individual, what is the specific, precise currency we are truly spending when we accept the title of ‘Empowered Leader’?